"

Ultimately, the Democrats did not need Cao’s vote to pass their bill. But his vote spoiled his party’s hopes for a unanimous GOP rejection of the Democratic plan and will certainly make him a hero to Democrats and liberal bloggers, and a villain to many conservatives.

Some national Republicans, however, are likely to cut Cao considerable slack because of his unique political circumstance as probably the most politically vulnerable Republican incumbent in Congress.

By the same token, national Democrats will likely be forgiving of Melancon’s “no” vote, knowing how difficult it would have been for him to defend a vote for the Democratic plan during a statewide campaign against Sen. David Vitter, R-LA, who would love to hang the blame for a “government takeover” of health care and the creation of a “public option” around Melancon’s neck. Democrats also can afford to be forgiving because Melancon’s vote was not crucial to the bill’s passage.

"

Haha, it all boils down to fucking politics.

Fuck all of you fucking politicians.

(via the Times-Picayune)

(via inothernews)

When people say no more politics as usual they are playing the usual politics…and I hope to do so in the future, damn you necessary evil.

The numbers from last nights vote on the House health-care bill of the Democrats who voted against the measure. I understand if you oppose a measure for a legitimate reason but more or less the way Washington works is that the congresspeople are really just watching out for their seats and apart from the blue dogs the others were either freshman Dems who won their seats from Republicans last year or those who had McCain win their district in the election.

I can see the same method played by the GOP as a whole, the party is moving away from the center and many are starting to label moderates as leftist (in reality they are on the left of those who are farther right but we all get what I’m trying to say). I can see this as a way to redefine the values the GOP wants to present to the public. Those who dwell in the political grey are being cast off by the GOP and the Dems who have conservative leanings are also getting shaken up when they don’t fall in line.

When there are major gains by one side the other usually goes through a period of redefinition which lasts until the next round of elections. We have seen the Democracts haggle more now with a ‘supermajority’ then when spread was pretty much half-half.

(via mutations)
That baby’s face is hilarious, i can’t compse myself.

(via mutations)

That baby’s face is hilarious, i can’t compse myself.

Big Fat Whale by Brian McFadden
MMMMM pity chips.
ginobambino:

The #10 and #47 beers in the world according to Top Beers on Planet Earth. Brooklyn Black OPS is #100.

reblogged for future reference.

ginobambino:

The #10 and #47 beers in the world according to Top Beers on Planet Earth. Brooklyn Black OPS is #100.

reblogged for future reference.

joshruben:

“The first half of Obama’s accomplishments above is mostly liberal stuff. The bottom half is all pretty dang conservative. Which brings us to The Problem With America Today: Blame it on the Internet, on partisan politics, on the economic crash, on the legacy of war or Fox News or Michael Moore, but our vital center is getting stiff — and it is starting to stink.”
Great article.
purns:


Whaddaya Mean Obama Hasn’t Done Anything?

By John H. Richardson
I have figured out The Problem With America Today. My inspiration was the recent one-year-later cover of Newsweek, which encapsulates the current conventional wisdom about President Obama in a single headline: YES HE CAN (BUT HE SURE HASN’T YET). Or, as Saturday Night Live put it, President Obama’s two biggest accomplishments thus far are “Jack and Squat.” You can find other versions of this perspective from Matt Lauer and David Gregory on NBC, from thousands of obnoxious bloggers, even from the hapless governor of New York.
These days, the argument that Obama hasn’t accomplished anything may be the only example of real bipartisanship in America.
Here’s the conventional wisdom in a single paragraph: Three hundred and sixty-four days after he was elected president, Obama is still stuck in Iraq, hasn’t closed Guantánamo, is getting deeper into Afghanistan, hasn’t accomplished health-care reform or slowed the rise in unemployment. His promises of bipartisanship are a punch line (see above). And there’s still no peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians. What a failure! What a splash of cold water in the face of all our bold hopes!
But the conventional wisdom is insane. Consider the record:
A week before he was sworn in, Obama jammed part two of the bank bailout down the throat of his own party — a $350 billion accomplishment.
Two days after he was sworn in, Obama banned the use of “harsh interrogation” and ordered the closing of Guantánamo.
A day later, Obama reversed George W. Bush’s funding cutoff to overseas family planning organizations — saving millions of lives with the stroke of a pen.
Three days after that, Obama gave a green light to the California car-emissions standards that Bush had been blocking for six years — an important step on the road to cleaner air and a cooler planet.
Two weeks after that, Obama signed the stimulus bill — a $787 billion accomplishment.
Ten days after that, Obama formally announced America’s withdrawal from Iraq.
A week later — we’re in early March now — Obama erased Bush’s decision to restrict federal funding for stem-cell research.
In April and June, Obama forced Chrysler and GM into bankruptcy.
In June, Obama reset the tone of our relations with the entire Arab world with a single speech — an accomplishment that the Bush administration failed to achieve despite a series of desperate PR moves (anyone remember Charlotte Beers?) and a “public diplomacy” budget of $1 billion a year.
Also in June, Obama unveiled the “Cash for Clunkers” program, a “socialist” giveaway that reanimated the corpse of our car industry — leading, for example, to the billion-dollar profit that Ford announced on Monday.
I haven’t even mentioned Sonia Sotomayor, the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, the order to release the torture memos, Obama’s push for charter schools, his $288 billion tax cut, or the end of Bush’s war on medical marijuana. Or the minor fact that he seems to have — with Bush’s help, it must be said — stopped the financial collapse, revived the credit markets, and nudged the economy toward 3.5 percent growth in the last quarter.
Oh, and one more thing: President Obama is now a month or two from accomplishing the awesome and seemingly impossible task that eluded mighty presidents like FDR, LBJ, and WJC — health-care reform.
Obama’s early returns also include a host of remarkably cautious and prudent national-security decisions that seem, these days, to have been completely forgotten:
Appointing a conservative Bush holdover like Robert Gates as Secretary of Defense.
Appointing an establishment centrist like Leon Panetta at CIA.
Appointing a hard-ass like Stanley McChrystal to head up our military forces in Afghanistan, despite McChrystal’s dubious involvement in torture and the cover-up of Pat Tillman’s death.
Increasing the number of drone attacks on Al Qaeda — more in the last year than all the Bush years combined.
Reinstating, with tweaks, Bush’s military tribunal system for Guantánamo prisoners.
Fighting, in another unexpected defense of a controversial Bush policy, lawsuits against the “warrantless wiretapping” program — as recently as this weekend with a decision that a leading civil liberties group called “extremely disappointing.”
Sending, way back in February, seventeen thousand more soldiers to Afghanistan. As Fareed Zakaira recently pointed out, this was just three thousand fewer soldiers than Bush sent to Iraq for his famous “surge.”
Noticing a pattern yet? The first half of Obama’s accomplishments above is mostly liberal stuff. The bottom half is all pretty dang conservative. Which brings us to The Problem With America Today: Blame it on the Internet, on partisan politics, on the economic crash, on the legacy of war or Fox News or Michael Moore, but our vital center is getting stiff — and it is starting to stink.
Liberals are upset because Obama didn’t shut down Guantánamo or stop the wiretapping program or end all wars or support gay marriage and kill Don’t Ask Don’t Tell. Conservatives are pissed off because they hate health-care reform, family planning, ending any war at all, organic gardening at the White House, and government in general.
What’s worse, both sides are so angry and righteous that they can’t even begin to give credit where it is due. When was the last time you heard a conservative cheer about that $288 billion tax cut? Or credit Obama for the centrism it took to appoint McChrystal, Panetta, and Gates? And how many liberals choose to be understanding about the practical difficulties of shutting down Guantánamo, achieving equal rights for gays, or tapping Al Qaeda’s phones?
And where, on either side, can you find a scrap of humility about the staggeringly complex challenge of Afghanistan and Pakistan? Or a scrap of gratitude at having escaped global financial doom?
So the question, a year since we elected him, isn’t how much Obama has accomplished. The question is why we’ve turned so small and mean that we only see half of it — the half we happen to agree with.


We are going through the motions. We tend to head towards the center before an election, and then a skew happens afterwards. With Bush there was a rally round the flag effect due to crisis and it re-centered the public and pushed up the ability to govern to one side.
Obama is going through the motions without a rally round the flag and he also is experiencing an effect that places public scorn against those in power even if changes are made. That effect is due to a recession, major gains by one party, and an inherited war. These things will always be huge points that allow for the political atmosphere to change before and election and then cause issues once the election is over. We see that those who wanted a specific parties ideology to solve problems will then scrutinize when quick action isn’t taken, especially with war and the economy, there are no quick fixes but that’s what we expect after an election cycle.

joshruben:

“The first half of Obama’s accomplishments above is mostly liberal stuff. The bottom half is all pretty dang conservative. Which brings us to The Problem With America Today: Blame it on the Internet, on partisan politics, on the economic crash, on the legacy of war or Fox News or Michael Moore, but our vital center is getting stiff — and it is starting to stink.”

Great article.

purns:

Whaddaya Mean Obama Hasn’t Done Anything?

By John H. Richardson

I have figured out The Problem With America Today. My inspiration was the recent one-year-later cover of Newsweek, which encapsulates the current conventional wisdom about President Obama in a single headline: YES HE CAN (BUT HE SURE HASN’T YET). Or, as Saturday Night Live put it, President Obama’s two biggest accomplishments thus far are “Jack and Squat.” You can find other versions of this perspective from Matt Lauer and David Gregory on NBC, from thousands of obnoxious bloggers, even from the hapless governor of New York.

These days, the argument that Obama hasn’t accomplished anything may be the only example of real bipartisanship in America.

Here’s the conventional wisdom in a single paragraph: Three hundred and sixty-four days after he was elected president, Obama is still stuck in Iraq, hasn’t closed Guantánamo, is getting deeper into Afghanistan, hasn’t accomplished health-care reform or slowed the rise in unemployment. His promises of bipartisanship are a punch line (see above). And there’s still no peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians. What a failure! What a splash of cold water in the face of all our bold hopes!

But the conventional wisdom is insane. Consider the record:

A week before he was sworn in, Obama jammed part two of the bank bailout down the throat of his own party — a $350 billion accomplishment.

Two days after he was sworn in, Obama banned the use of “harsh interrogation” and ordered the closing of Guantánamo.

A day later, Obama reversed George W. Bush’s funding cutoff to overseas family planning organizations — saving millions of lives with the stroke of a pen.

Three days after that, Obama gave a green light to the California car-emissions standards that Bush had been blocking for six years — an important step on the road to cleaner air and a cooler planet.

Two weeks after that, Obama signed the stimulus bill — a $787 billion accomplishment.

Ten days after that, Obama formally announced America’s withdrawal from Iraq.

A week later — we’re in early March now — Obama erased Bush’s decision to restrict federal funding for stem-cell research.

In April and June, Obama forced Chrysler and GM into bankruptcy.

In June, Obama reset the tone of our relations with the entire Arab world with a single speech — an accomplishment that the Bush administration failed to achieve despite a series of desperate PR moves (anyone remember Charlotte Beers?) and a “public diplomacy” budget of $1 billion a year.

Also in June, Obama unveiled the “Cash for Clunkers” program, a “socialist” giveaway that reanimated the corpse of our car industry — leading, for example, to the billion-dollar profit that Ford announced on Monday.

I haven’t even mentioned Sonia Sotomayor, the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, the order to release the torture memos, Obama’s push for charter schools, his $288 billion tax cut, or the end of Bush’s war on medical marijuana. Or the minor fact that he seems to have — with Bush’s help, it must be said — stopped the financial collapse, revived the credit markets, and nudged the economy toward 3.5 percent growth in the last quarter.

Oh, and one more thing: President Obama is now a month or two from accomplishing the awesome and seemingly impossible task that eluded mighty presidents like FDR, LBJ, and WJC — health-care reform.

Obama’s early returns also include a host of remarkably cautious and prudent national-security decisions that seem, these days, to have been completely forgotten:

Appointing a conservative Bush holdover like Robert Gates as Secretary of Defense.

Appointing an establishment centrist like Leon Panetta at CIA.

Appointing a hard-ass like Stanley McChrystal to head up our military forces in Afghanistan, despite McChrystal’s dubious involvement in torture and the cover-up of Pat Tillman’s death.

Increasing the number of drone attacks on Al Qaeda — more in the last year than all the Bush years combined.

Reinstating, with tweaks, Bush’s military tribunal system for Guantánamo prisoners.

Fighting, in another unexpected defense of a controversial Bush policy, lawsuits against the “warrantless wiretapping” program — as recently as this weekend with a decision that a leading civil liberties group called “extremely disappointing.”

Sending, way back in February, seventeen thousand more soldiers to Afghanistan. As Fareed Zakaira recently pointed out, this was just three thousand fewer soldiers than Bush sent to Iraq for his famous “surge.”

Noticing a pattern yet? The first half of Obama’s accomplishments above is mostly liberal stuff. The bottom half is all pretty dang conservative. Which brings us to The Problem With America Today: Blame it on the Internet, on partisan politics, on the economic crash, on the legacy of war or Fox News or Michael Moore, but our vital center is getting stiff — and it is starting to stink.

Liberals are upset because Obama didn’t shut down Guantánamo or stop the wiretapping program or end all wars or support gay marriage and kill Don’t Ask Don’t Tell. Conservatives are pissed off because they hate health-care reform, family planning, ending any war at all, organic gardening at the White House, and government in general.

What’s worse, both sides are so angry and righteous that they can’t even begin to give credit where it is due. When was the last time you heard a conservative cheer about that $288 billion tax cut? Or credit Obama for the centrism it took to appoint McChrystal, Panetta, and Gates? And how many liberals choose to be understanding about the practical difficulties of shutting down Guantánamo, achieving equal rights for gays, or tapping Al Qaeda’s phones?

And where, on either side, can you find a scrap of humility about the staggeringly complex challenge of Afghanistan and Pakistan? Or a scrap of gratitude at having escaped global financial doom?

So the question, a year since we elected him, isn’t how much Obama has accomplished. The question is why we’ve turned so small and mean that we only see half of it — the half we happen to agree with.

We are going through the motions. We tend to head towards the center before an election, and then a skew happens afterwards. With Bush there was a rally round the flag effect due to crisis and it re-centered the public and pushed up the ability to govern to one side.

Obama is going through the motions without a rally round the flag and he also is experiencing an effect that places public scorn against those in power even if changes are made. That effect is due to a recession, major gains by one party, and an inherited war. These things will always be huge points that allow for the political atmosphere to change before and election and then cause issues once the election is over. We see that those who wanted a specific parties ideology to solve problems will then scrutinize when quick action isn’t taken, especially with war and the economy, there are no quick fixes but that’s what we expect after an election cycle.

49% voters in Virginia approve of Obama

jasencomstock:

thepoliticalpartygirl:

brooklynmutt:

the gubernatorial elections in Virginia and New Jersey looked less like a referendum on Barack Obama than a reflection of their own candidates and issues.

About half the voters in Virginia and a majority in New Jersey – 49 and 58 percent, respectively – approved of the way Obama is handling his job. Most in both states, moreover, said the president was not a factor in their vote.

abcnews

You hear that, pundits?  Can you kindly stop talking about how the election reflects the public’s opinion of Obama now?

30% of them are lying.

10% were confused by the questioning.

"1. Your interview attire is outdated/messy/too tight/too revealing/too flashy.
2. Your physical appearance is disheveled/outdated/sloppy/smelly/overpowering (i.e. too much perfume).
3. Your eye contact is weak/shifty/intense.
4. Your handshake is limp/too forceful/clammy.
5. You say ah/um/like too much.
6. You talk too much/use poor grammar/say inappropriate things (i.e. swearing) when you answer interview questions.
7. You appear overconfident/pushy/self-centered/insecure/aloof/ditzy/scatter-brained/desperate.
8. You talk too fast/too slow/too loud/too soft.
9. You giggle/fidget/act awkward/have facial tics/lack expression.
10. You lack sincerity/self-confidence/clarity/conviction."

10 Things Recruiters Won’t Tell You (But I Will) | CAREEREALISM: Because EVERY Job is Temporary (via robot-heart)

So basically humans don’t stand a chance when interviewing. Robots are gonna take er jerbs the unleash their devastating apocalypse upon. Doomed I say DOOOOOOOOOMED.

Is Adrien Brody still in Hilo?

vanessmonster:

heavysigh:

vanessmonster:

Or did I miss him?
Can I still gallivant around town hoping to run into him?!

They left today and Sunday. Curse me not working the night shift so I could see them at the restaurant.

Aww man. He went to Millie’s, in Keaukaha, where my friend works. I think she served him and everything.

Lucky. Definitely Brody, Topher Grace and several other leads and crew ended up at Reuben’s like every other day, I do know that I made the guy in the predator suit his lunch. Oh Hilowood.

muppetpants:

Important college advice: I could buy a sixer of this for ~$9.  At 8% alcohol, it was about double that of cheap, shitty beers.  I could get fucking annihilated off of a sixer of this.  It was my go-to bier in college.  I am currently drinking it.  Nostalgia.

The lack of micro-brew variety on the island saddens me. We have Kona Brew Pub and Mehana, but the latter tends to lack variation since its really local and the former tends to be a bit on the pricey side. Curse you continental U.S. and your beer selection.

muppetpants:

Important college advice: I could buy a sixer of this for ~$9.  At 8% alcohol, it was about double that of cheap, shitty beers.  I could get fucking annihilated off of a sixer of this.  It was my go-to bier in college.  I am currently drinking it.  Nostalgia.

The lack of micro-brew variety on the island saddens me. We have Kona Brew Pub and Mehana, but the latter tends to lack variation since its really local and the former tends to be a bit on the pricey side. Curse you continental U.S. and your beer selection.

Is Adrien Brody still in Hilo?

vanessmonster:

Or did I miss him?
Can I still gallivant around town hoping to run into him?!

They left today and Sunday. Curse me not working the night shift so I could see them at the restaurant.

juliasegal:

When Jay-Z gets hungry…

You do not put a 20 percent gratuity on a bill that huge, you best be happy with a fifty dollar bill.

juliasegal:

When Jay-Z gets hungry…

You do not put a 20 percent gratuity on a bill that huge, you best be happy with a fifty dollar bill.

notthatkindagay:

skimmingthesurface:

“That would be the general color of the night sky if the universe wasn’t expanding. You’ve probably never wondered why the night sky is black. “No sun,” you point out. “Duh.” But it’s not that simple. Every single bit of sky is full of stars, all blazing away. The light may take a long time to get here, but it does get here. So, on that basis, the night sky ought to be a carpet of light from all those uncountable stars. But since the universe is expanding, they’re all moving away from us. Since they’re moving, there’s a Doppler effect and the light is shifted to other wavelengths. The further away they are, the more it’s shifted, until all their light shifts right out of the visible range. And that’s why the night sky is dark except for the few stars whose light is still visible.So the next time you’re admiring the night, look at the dark, too, and remember that you’re watching the universe grow.”
Shakesville: The color of night

sts knows i have boners for this kinda stuff.

Ayaaa.

notthatkindagay:

skimmingthesurface:

“That would be the general color of the night sky if the universe wasn’t expanding. You’ve probably never wondered why the night sky is black. “No sun,” you point out. “Duh.” But it’s not that simple. Every single bit of sky is full of stars, all blazing away. The light may take a long time to get here, but it does get here. So, on that basis, the night sky ought to be a carpet of light from all those uncountable stars. But since the universe is expanding, they’re all moving away from us. Since they’re moving, there’s a Doppler effect and the light is shifted to other wavelengths. The further away they are, the more it’s shifted, until all their light shifts right out of the visible range. And that’s why the night sky is dark except for the few stars whose light is still visible.

So the next time you’re admiring the night, look at the dark, too, and remember that you’re watching the universe grow.”

Shakesville: The color of night

sts knows i have boners for this kinda stuff.

Ayaaa.

New word suggestion: A/Effect

shutupinternet:

Noun/Verb - A/Effect: a combination of affect and effect for the writer who doesn’t know which one to use but doesn’t want to be wrong. Allows the reader to choose the correct form in the context that the word appears, placing the burden of being grammatically correct on the reader rather than the writer.

This is definitely in tune with what I said a couple days ago about English and its many rules that I don’t really want to care about but still understand.

Lets take its/it’s for example it’s = it is and its = possessive form, why not just use its and end it at that we can figure out the context.

I think we should create another dialect of English and call it either lazy or alleviated English.

1 of 93
Themed by: Hunson